Saturday, June 13, 2009

MISSING IN ACTION:THE AMERICAN CHRISTIAN SOLDIER (PART 1)

PREFACE: This wasn’t the direction I intended to go with my first blog entry. I had something written months ago that I planned to use to start the ball rolling. Then I prayed about it. Note to self: next time, pray first. For now, I’ll go where He leads.


“With the help of the Holy Spirit who lives within us, carefully guard what has been entrusted to you. As you know, all the Christians who came here from the province of Asia have deserted me; even Phygelus and Hermogenes are gone.” (2 Timothy 1:14-15, emphasis mine)

Nobody likes a deserter. I’ll take the red badge of courage, please. No white flags here. Do you know any Christians who have deserted the faith? What does it mean to desert the faith in America, anyways? Seriously, what does that look like in our country? It’s not like anyone is going to shoot you on the retreat. Or will they? Perhaps. Or perhaps you’ll get a medal.

Paul certainly found some people running the wrong way on the battlefield in his day. And he wasn’t shy about it either. He named names. I have no idea who Phygelus and Hermogenes were, but they are forever branded with the name of “traitor.” It’s a good thing that we don’t have any Testament turncoats in modern day America. Whew.

Don’t worry. I’m not about to start naming names. I will recommend a few for commendations, though. Why don’t we start there. What does it take for a soldier to become distinguished in battle?

A few years ago I read a book that blew my mind. It was called “The Heavenly Man,” the biography of Brother Yun and the underground church in China. The book details the many torturous years Brother Yun spent in prison. He could have gotten out of his cell and avoided the near fatal beatings, the starvation, the living quarters soaked in the urine and feces of angry fellow prisoners, and much, much more if he had done one simple thing: deny Christ. But he would not turn tail and run. He was not a deserter. He was the real deal. And he has the battle scars to prove it.

Brother Yun told another tale that made me lay awake at night. It was the true story of a dear Chinese saint who also would not denounce her Faith. She was a single mother of two small children. The Chinese government marched her little ones out in front of her and told her to choose. They told her to reject Christ or go to prison and let the communist government raise her children. She chose her Savior. And she lost what was most precious to her in the (physical) world. She served a 20 year sentence. Her children were told repeatedly that she chose Jesus over them. When she was released, her older son wanted nothing to do with her. She suffered a loss that we can barely begin to imagine on this side of the globe. But she stood firm. She was not a deserter. Her faith proved genuine. What distinguished medals of honor must await her in the heavenlies!

I’d say that these two individuals deserve a red badge. They will have great crowns to lay at the Almighty’s feet one day. That is life for a true Believer in communist China.

But what about America? I’d say that life is pretty easy for a Believer in the States. Some might be asking themselves, “Where exactly is the battle, anyways?” The answer is clear in China. It may be a little muddy here. In this land of untold freedom, would anybody notice if a Christian soldier left the battlefield? Would anybody notice if a battalion, or even an entire division did?

I have heard some people sounding the alarm in our nation. You may have heard their cries. They are saying, “That guy is heading the wrong way! This church is retreating! So is that denomination!” Are they just some fundamentalist whacos who boo-hoo every time somebody disagrees with their particular brand of Christianity? Or are they the soldiers occupying the watchtowers and front lines of battle, with a better view of the impending threat? It is important to know. Are they piping propaganda or prophecy?

The claims are serious. Apostasy. Blasphemy. Heresy. Those things aren’t happening in America, are they? Do we have the spiritual discernment to see them if they are? And if they are, do we have the courage to address them? I ran across this section of Scripture the other day and I was dumbfounded. This is Paul talking to the church at Corinth:

"(2) I am told that you have a man in your church who is living in sin with his father’s wife. And you are so proud of yourselves! Why aren’t you mourning in sorrow and shame? And why haven’t you removed this man from your fellowship? (3) Even though I am not there with you in person, I am with you in the Spirit. Concerning the one who has done this, I have already passed judgment in the name of the Lord Jesus. You are to call a meeting of the church, and I will be there in spirit, and the power of the Lord Jesus will be there as you meet. (5) Then you must cast this man out of the church and into Satan’s hands, so that his sinful nature will be destroyed and he himself will be saved when the Lord returns… (7) Don’t you realize that if even one person is allowed to go on sinning, soon all will be affected. Remove this wicked person from among you so that you can stay pure." (1 Corinthians 5, NLT)

When is the last time you saw that happen at a church gathering? When is the last time you should have? I remember one instance, in over 30 years of church going, where the sin of a church elder was addressed publicly from the pulpit. The guilty man came before the congregation, surrounded by the pastor, elders and deacons, and repented for having an affair with a woman at his workplace. That was one rough morning in church. It was painful. He cried. His wife cried. The congregation cried. He stepped down from church leadership. We prayed for him and were told of the extensive steps that the church would take to counsel and restore him. Leaving the Lord’s house that day, I remember thinking that I trusted my church leadership a little more than when I had arrived. In a painfully public way, the church drew a line and told the elder to pick a side. He chose wisely. You might say that he had retreated, but then he chose to re-enlist.

I recall being told by a dear friend of a very different experience in her town. She knew a woman who was involved in the most incredible soap opera at her church. She had been the pastor’s wife. They had several beautiful children. Her husband fell in love with the choir director. So he divorced her and married the lead chorister. Somehow, the church remained in tact with the pastor at the helm and the choir director as his new second. And the scorned first wife continued to attend the church… with the kids! I was incredulous. Where was the shame? Where was the outrage? Where were the fireworks from the big 1 Corinthians 5 confrontation? They were strangely absent. No one drew a line. As a result, the pastor and a lot of other people chose unwisely. You might say that that this pastor retreated, and the congregation just did an about face and fell in line.

Exodus is one of my very favorite books of the Bible. It contains some of God’s mightiest displays of power. I particularly love that whole section where God meets Moses on the mountain. The heaven’s roar with thunder and lighting. The earth trembles. Smoke billows from the sky. And God Himself comes down to the mountain in a huge cloud of smoke. Intense. After Moses returns from His 40 day One on one with the Man with the Plan, he discovers that the Israelites have been having an orgy while worshipping a golden calf. Pretty incredible. Moses stands at the entrance to the camp and shouts, “All of you who are on the Lord’s side, come over here and join me.” (Exodus 32:26) So he drew a line in the sand and told the people to take sides. (It seems that Moses, like Paul, didn’t have trouble singling people out.) Some chose wisely. Others didn’t. God used the Levites to exact judgment on those who sided with the calf. It wasn’t pretty.

Fast forward just a bit, and members of the very tribe who chose wisely in Exodus 32, incite a rebellion against God. They are jealous that Moses and Aaron get to do all the cool stuff. “They went to Moses and Aaron and said, ‘You have gone too far! EVERYONE in Israel has been set apart by the Lord, and He is with ALL OF US. What right do you have to act as though you are greater than anyone else among all these people of the Lord?” (Numbers 16:3, emphasis mine) In other words, “We’re ALL right. You don’t have a monopoly on the Truth.” Can I just ask if any of this sounding familiar? Ok, so part of what they said was true. Moses didn’t have a monopoly on the Truth. But God did. And Moses knew God. So what happens this time? Again, Moses draws a line in the sand. He tells the Israelites, “Quick… Get away from these wicked men, and don’t touch anything that belongs to them. If you do you will be destroyed for their sins.” (verse 26) Then in one of the most dramatic judgments of the entire Old Testament, the ground splits open and swallows the infidels. Wow. Also not pretty.

So where am I going with this? Clearly Christians deserted the battlefield during Biblical times, and they continue to do so today. This blog will seek to raise awareness in the body of Christ. We need to know where we are vulnerable, where we may be in jeopardy of crossing a critical boundary that God has set in His Word. Are there some places where, like Moses, we may need to draw a line and say, “If you want to be in tune with the Biblical standard set by God in Scripture, you need to be standing over here. Otherwise you may be deserting the battlefield at a vital juncture. You may be a Christian soldier who is 'Missing in Action'.” I think that we will find a few places like that.

Now please DO NOT misunderstand me. I’m not suggesting that we go looking for petty little places to make divisions in the body of Christ. I’m not talking about heightening whatever trivial, or even significant, differences we have to critical mass. But nearly every generation depicted in Scripture encountered some pivotal issues where crucial decisions had to be made. And occasionally, lines had to be drawn. Some rose to the occasion and fought on, others deserted. So let’s ask ourselves: Are there any issues that rise to that level of importance in the body of Christ today? If there are and we are ignoring them, we do so at our own peril.

We will also talk about a lot of less critical issues, those significant topics that are clearly important, but should never rise to the level of drawing a line. Some may be areas of grave danger, where Christians should know to exert great caution. Some may be matters of mere spiritual curiosity. In these places Believers should say, “You know, here’s where I stand on this issue and this is why, but there’s room for other perspectives at the table.” You say tom—aye—toe. I say tom—mah—toe. Doesn’t mean we have to call the whole thing off.

You might be asking yourself, is this even possible? Can we discuss issues where lines may be drawn, or deeply felt convictions lie on opposite sides of the pendulum, all the while maintaining our loving witness? I don’t believe that it is easy. But I do believe that it is necessary. Otherwise I wouldn’t be doing this. If we simply ignore all issues that are controversial for the sake of community, then we will have a community strong in number, but weak in knowledge, conviction and practice. I fear that the American church may be weak in these and many other areas. We have a lot to learn from our Christian brethren around the world, where suffering has killed the flesh and fortified the spirit. They know the Lord. They are intimately acquainted with the Sword of the Spirit, the weapons of warfare. In the States, we are more intimately acquainted with the remote than the Rhema. But that… is a topic for another blog. For now, I hope to find some other Believers interested in a good spiritual work out.

So one last question: Anybody with me?

23 comments:

  1. This was written in another forum I participate in:

    "The argument is, if we love others…if we truly, truly love them, we want their “happiness” above everything else. Supporters of such a view argue that love means we never speak of judgment, since God doesn’t judge. And whatever we do, we NEVER offend the sensibilities of the lost, otherwise the door to repentance is closed.

    I realize that there are well intended people who have been leavened to believe this. Such people are deceived, and none of us are immune to deception if we do not continue faithfully in his word. But huge antennas go up, when such well intended people, who claim to be Christians are faced with their own distortion of Scripture, and will not back away from it. Rather than admit that they misrepresented the word of God, they go on these useless rants about the other's person's character."

    I responded:

    "Amen! You hit the nail square on the head.

    The truths of the Bible were written for sinners who are willing to be redeemed people. The church is filled with people who want to be blessed, but are unwilling to be changed. The truths of the Bible can only be truly lived by redeemed people. Unredeemed people distort the truths of the Bible to justify their sin.

    When Jesus declared "Do not judge so that you will not be judged" in Matt 7:1, He went on to say, "For in the way you judge, you will be judged; and by your standard of measure, it will be measured to you."

    Jesus was not talking here about His measure of judgment, but about our measure of judgment. We are never to judge with our judgment. But when we are able to see without logs in our eyes, then it is right to "take the speck out of your brother's eye" (Matt 7:5) using the things God has judged in His Word. If a person is not a brother in Christ, then full and complete "repentance" is needed first."

    Blessings

    ReplyDelete
  2. Let's look again at the sin referred to in 1 Cor 5 where someone "in the church" was having sex with his father's wife, and the church was doing nothing about it!

    Was it right for Paul to bring this kind of judgment to the Corinthian church where he was their spiritual father? The answer is a resounding YES!!! This judgment by Paul worked very well, too well for Paul had to write this in 2 Cor 2 telling them to "reaffirm your love for him" after he had repented.

    5 But if any has caused sorrow, he has caused sorrow not to me, but in some degree--in order not to say too much--to all of you.
    6 Sufficient for such a one is this punishment which was inflicted by the majority,
    7 so that on the contrary you should rather forgive and comfort him, otherwise such a one might be overwhelmed by excessive sorrow.
    8 Wherefore I urge you to reaffirm your love for him.
    9 For to this end also I wrote, so that I might put you to the test, whether you are obedient in all things.
    10 But one whom you forgive anything, I forgive also; for indeed what I have forgiven, if I have forgiven anything, I did it for your sakes in the presence of Christ,
    11 so that no advantage would be taken of us by Satan, for we are not ignorant of his schemes.

    Blessings

    ReplyDelete
  3. The advice Paul gave to the Corinthians is amplified in Gal 6:1-10:

    1 Brethren, even if anyone is caught in any trespass, you who are spiritual, restore such a one in a spirit of gentleness; each one looking to yourself, so that you too will not be tempted.
    2 Bear one another's burdens, and thereby fulfill the law of Christ.
    3 For if anyone thinks he is something when he is nothing, he deceives himself.
    4 But each one must examine his own work, and then he will have reason for boasting in regard to himself alone, and not in regard to another.
    5 For each one will bear his own load.
    6 The one who is taught the word is to share all good things with the one who teaches him.
    7 Do not be deceived, God is not mocked; for whatever a man sows, this he will also reap.
    8 For the one who sows to his own flesh will from the flesh reap corruption, but the one who sows to the Spirit will from the Spirit reap eternal life.
    9 Let us not lose heart in doing good, for in due time we will reap if we do not grow weary.
    10 So then, while we have opportunity, let us do good to all people, and especially to those who are of the household of the faith.

    Restoring Christians who are caught in trespasses is a ministry the Church does not handle very well for several reasons:

    (1) Christians who tresspass against others or commit sinfull behaviors many times are not accountable to others in their church.

    (2) Churches many times do not know how to restore Christians in the church who fall into sin.

    (30 It rquires deeper levels of covenant relationships among Christians before Christians can apply the truths of how brethren are to walk out their "agape love" faith with each other.

    Blessings

    ReplyDelete
  4. When a Christian brethren is caught in a trespass (sin), rarely is that person restored to the same or even greater position in ministry. Why you might ask? I believe it's because those who are caught in their sin are generally more concerned about the consequences of their sin than they are about the cause of their sin.

    Several decades ago a man named Gordon MacDonald had a one time affair with his secretary. He wrote about this sin in his book "Repairing Your Broken World." At that time Gordon was head of the Navigators - http://www.navigators.org/us/ - an international Christian outreach ministry to college campuses, military bases, inner cities, prisons, and youth camps.

    Here's the difference between this Christian's sin and most other sins committed by Christians. No one knew about this affair except Gordon, the woman he had an affair with, and God. God brought Gordon under such conviction of his sin that he could not live with himself, nor his lack of communion with God. Gordon first repented in sorrow to God. Then he confessed his sin to his wife, asking her for forgiveness, which she gave to him. Finally he confessed his sin to his Navigator board, and placed himself under their counsel and direction for restoration and marraige healing as directed in Gal 6. As the restoration process moved forward, Gordon continued as head of the Navigators, submitting to their wise counsel to restore his broken relationship with God, man, and his family. But before the restoration process was completed, word leaked out concerning his affair and was about to be reported in the press. Rather than allowing this sin stain to be placed upon the Navigators, Gordon then resigned as head of the Navigators. Gordon continued thru the restoration process with his board and family, has written some of the most influential books on how to grow into Christian maturity, and was fully restored as a pastor. I recommend any of his books highly.

    Would Gordon's latter position be where it is today if he had been caught in his sin, rather than first confessing his sin? Experience tells us time and time again, NO!!!

    Num 32:23 "But if you will not do so, behold, you have sinned against the LORD, and be sure your sin will find you out.

    ReplyDelete
  5. When our sin finds us out (Num 32:23) rather than first confessing our sin to God and to others we are accountable to and submitting to and completing a restoration process, our latter condition is usually never restored to our former position of influence and honor. History is replete with numerous examples what happened to sinners when their sin found them out, but few examples of those such as Gordon MacDonald who did the right thing.

    Blessings

    ReplyDelete
  6. Let's look at one more Biblical example. David lived a charmed/blessed life from the time he was born. Bears, lions, giants, enemies fell before him as he waited before God for his time to serve as king. Then he committed sin with Bathsheba, killed Uriah, brought Bathsheba to his house to become his wife, and bore her child. "But the thing that David had done was evil in the sight of the LORD." (2 Sam 11:27)

    At first David could not recognize himself in the rich man poor man story as Nathan came to expose his sin. When David's anger exploaded against the rich man,

    2 Sam 12:7 Nathan then said to David, "You are the man!" Thus says the LORD God of Israel, ' It is I who anointed you king over Israel and it is I who delivered you from the hand of Saul.
    8 'I also gave you your master's house and your master's wives into your care, and I gave you the house of Israel and Judah; and if that had been too little, I would have added to you many more things like these!
    9 'Why have you despised the word of the by doing evil in His sight? You have struck down Uriah the Hittite with the sword, have taken his wife to be your wife, and have killed him with the sword of the sons of Ammon.
    10 'Now therefore, the sword shall never depart from your house, because you have despised Me and have taken the wife of Uriah the Hittite to be your wife.'
    11 "Thus says the LORD, 'Behold, I will raise up evil against you from your own household; I will even take your wives before your eyes and give them to your companion, and he will lie with your wives in broad daylight.
    12 'Indeed you did it secretly, but I will do this thing before all Israel, and under the sun.' "

    Actions have consequences, especially sins such as David committed. Even though David repented after his sin was exposed,

    13 Then David said to Nathan, "I have sinned against the LORD." And Nathan said to David, "The LORD also has taken away your sin; you shall not die.
    14 "However, because by this deed you have given occasion to the enemies of the LORD to blaspheme, the child also that is born to you shall surely die."

    I wonder what "I would have added to you many more things like these" (verse 8) God would have done for David if not for his great sin. Instead David's own household fell apart from this time forward.

    ReplyDelete
  7. According to a Mar 09 Barna poll, only 9% of Americans and 19% of born-again Christians have a Biblical worldview who answer positively to the following six statements:

    (1) Absolute moral truth exists;
    (2) the Bible is totally accurate in all of the principles it teaches;
    (3) Satan is considered to be a real being or force, not merely symbolic;
    (4) a person cannot earn their way into Heaven by trying to be good or do good works;
    (5) Jesus Christ lived a sinless life on earth; and
    (6) God is the all-knowing, all-powerful creator of the world who still rules the universe today.

    Does this bother you?

    ReplyDelete
  8. It bothers me because of what Jesus said in Luke 18:8:

    "I tell you that He will bring about justice for them quickly. However, when the Son of Man comes, will He find faith on the earth?"

    We are entering the end times where God's children will require endurance, as Jesus said in Matt 24:13,

    "But the one who endures to the end, he will be saved."

    Blessings

    ReplyDelete
  9. Boy in balloon story a hoax? and other hoaxes?

    http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/Aheado ... id=8842957

    It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out the lifting power of the balloon in question (~20x20x8=3200 cuft). A helium balloon of this size can lift 7.25 lbs.

    http://www.chem.hawaii.edu/uham/lift.html

    The father who built the balloon certainly knew that his balloon could not carry away his son into the air.

    Something is very rotten in Colorado!

    Is it any wonder that Americans are very gullible when it comes to understanding scientific facts or hoaxes!

    Let me show you one scientific fact that should be an eye opener to any person who's convinced that man-made CO2 emissions are the primary cause of the globes fluctuating temperatures.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_dio ... atmosphere

    In this article, it is shown that 95% of the CO2 emissions are not man-made. That leaves 5% to man-made CO2 emissions! But scientists don't tell the public these distinctions, and would have you believe that all CO2 emissions are bad and must therefore be controlled.

    Why are scientists not concerned about the 95% CO2 emissions that are not caused by man? They conveniently say 95% of CO2 emissions are counterbalanced by the earth's natural heat sinks that absorb CO2 emissions. Therefore, it must be the 5% man-made CO2 emissions that are causing our envirionmental woes! Does anyone remember the 1970's when scientists were concerned about global cooling, a mini iceage, and were trying to figure out how to warm up the earth?

    If the scientists really believed this junk science, then they would tell everyone to plant more trees/organic plants that absorb CO2. Instead world leaders, led by deceiving scientists, are demanding Cap & Trade laws to control our CO2 emissions. If you think government controlled health care will ruin our economy, just wait for Cap & Trade to become law!

    The Church needs to wake up before it's too late. "Abiding" in God's truth is what enables us to "know" God's truth and the truth about God's creation, thus setting us free to become everything God desires us to become as His new/never before existed creatures.

    Blessings

    ReplyDelete
  10. I messed up. The lift tables are in liters, not cu ft. A balloon of this size (3200 cu ft) could have lifted about 200 lbs minus the weight of balloon materials, if design properly.

    But word coming out now is that it truly was a hoax, and the parents are being charged with a crime.

    Man-made CO2 causing global warming is truly a hoax of colossal proportions.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Here are a few more facts regarding global warming:

    (1) If the ice caps on both poles melted over the next 100 years, the sea level would rise 8-18 inches, not 20 feet as the Goreites have exclaimed.

    (2) The medieval warm period from 800-1200 was warmer than the current warm period that ended in 1998, and mini iceage from 1550-1850 was colder than the recent cold period the 1960's & 1970's.

    (3) There has been global cooling for the last 8-9 years since 1998.

    (4) Temperatures change first, then CO2 changes follow, not the reverse.

    (5) CO2 levels in the atmosphere during the Cambrian period over 500 million years ago were 20 times higher than today's levels.

    (6) Sea ice in the artic has grown 27% between 2007-2009.

    (7) At the same time minimum artic ice was being reported, maximum anartic ice was not being reported.

    (8) Solar activity has been the greatest between 1925-1995 than at any time during the last 10,000 years. (Remember global cooling has occurred since 1998!)

    (9) There is only 1/10,000 more CO2 in our atmosphere today than during the 1700's.

    (10) The sea temperatures are now cooling, not warming.

    I encourage you to read this article by Richard Lindzen, the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Meteorology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    http://www.cato.org/pubs/regulation/regv15n2/reg15n2g.html

    ReplyDelete
  12. The gist of Richard Lindzen's article on Global warming can be summarized in these two statements:

    Indeed, a recent Gallup poll of climate scientists in the American Meteorological Society and in the American Geophysical Union shows that a vast majority doubts that there has been any identifiable man-caused warming to date (49 percent asserted no, 33 percent did not know, 18 percent thought some has occurred; however, among those actively involved in research and publishing frequently in peer-reviewed research journals, none believes that any man-caused global warming has been identified so far).

    I have already discussed some of the reasons for this instability: the existence of large cadres of professional planners looking for work, the existence of advocacy groups looking for profitable causes, the existence of agendas in search of saleable rationales, and the ability of many industries to profit from regulation, coupled with an effective neutralization of opposition. It goes almost without saying that the dangers and costs of those economic and social consequences may be far greater than the original environmental danger. That becomes especially true when the benefits of additional knowledge are rejected and when it is forgotten that improved technology and increased societal wealth are what allow society to deal with environmental threats most effectively. The control of societal instability may very well be the real challenge facing us.

    ReplyDelete
  13. "With less than two months to go before the big Copenhagen Conference on global warming, two major nations have said 'no thanks' to the no-growth agenda. For that reason alone, so should we. Following a deal signed late Thursday between China and India, anything we might agree to do in Copenhagen is likely moot anyway. The two mega-nations -- which together account for nearly a third of the world's population -- said they won't go along with a new climate treaty being drafted in Copenhagen to replace the Kyoto Protocol that expires in 2012. They're basically saying no to anything that forces them to impose mandatory limits on their output of greenhouse gas emissions. Other developing nations, including Mexico, Brazil and South Africa, will likely reject any proposals as well. The deal was already in trouble. Three weeks ago, the Group of 77 developing nations met in Thailand to discuss what they wanted to do about global warming. Their answer: nothing. William Hawkins, writing in the American Thinker, quotes a piece in China's Science Times journal that sums up how China -- and other developing nations -- feel: 'Why do the developed countries put an arguable scientific problem on the international negotiations table?' the article's author, Wang Jin, asks. 'The real intention is not for the global temperature increase, but for the restriction of the economic development of the developing countries.' They see clearly what the rest of us seem to miss -- that, for all its bad science, the Copenhagen Conference is about the world's Lilliputians tying down its Gullivers, not about global warming at all. So, thanks to China and India, Copenhagen is dead -- just as Kyoto was when it was signed in 1992, though no one knew it at the time. Without them, no global treaty on climate change will be workable." --Investor's Business Daily

    ReplyDelete
  14. Understanding What Happened at Fort Hood

    Is it possible to understand what happened at Fort Hood on 11/5/09 without considering any possible spiritual motivations on the part of Army Major Nidal Malik Hasan? If your answer to this question is “yes,” then you will not come close to understanding what happened on 11/5/09. If your answer to this question is “no,” then you may start on the road to understanding what happened.

    The key to understanding the events of time, history, and the rise & fall of empires, nations and governments is the spiritual factor. Someone has rightly said this truth about history: History is His(Christ’s)-story, and if you fail to understand His-story, you will not understand history past, history in the making, or where history is headed. The same truth may be applied to understanding the tragic events, especially evil events wherein an individual kills other people not in self defense, but in an act of violence against those they may or may not even know.

    If I were to strap a gun or bomb to myself, and then go on a killing rampage against people I may know or don’t know while proclaiming “Jesus is Lord,” would considering any spiritual motivating factors be off limits? The answer to this question seems to be “yes” if the person proclaims “Allah is the greatest” while performing a killing rampage.

    Jesus said this regarding evil, “The thief (Satan) comes only to steal, and kil, and destroy” (John 10:10a). Therefore, anyone who does any of these evil acts without just cause are being motivated by the evil one(s) – Satan or his demons. Have those who claim to be Christians gone of killing sprees, claiming God told them to kill others? To be sure, the answer is yes. But what happened at Fort Hood is what has been happening in Israel for Israel for many decades. Americans are getting a continuing taste of what happened on 911, and is an everyday threat for most Israelis, and is now spreading to many Muslim countries.

    Are most Muslims peace-loving people? To be sure the answer to this question is yes, but so are most Christians. But this is not the right question to be asking, for Muslims or Christians. The right question for Muslims to be asking is this: Why are more and more Muslims being motivated to kill, steal, and destroy in the name of their God Allah? Taking up arms and defending your homeland and families against American armies in Iraq and Afghanistan may be deemed a just cause. But taking up arms, bombs and planes against innocent people in the name of your God tells me that one’s God is a false god. The true God cane to give life (John 10:10b), not death. This is the truth most Muslims are not willing to accept or even consider. This is the politically incorrect truth that cannot be considered or stated when discussing the motivating factor of evil acts.

    Do you think for one nanosecond that if Christians proclaiming “Jesus is Lord” were going on killing sprees with guns, bombs and planes, killing innocent people by the thousands, hundreds, and tens, that the secular media worldwide would not be proclaiming that something is rotten within Christianity? This is precisely what has and is happening within Islam, yet we are asked to only look at peace-loving Muslims, while placing a muzzle on whether or not the evil which comes from Muslim terrorists who kill innocent people comes from roots within Islam itself.

    Until the world and all of its isms are willing to truthfully look at acts of evil from a spiritual perspective, especially those within their own ranks, and come to a right understanding of who is behind the force of evil, then the world will do nothing but offer a moment of silence for it’s slain, and the isms will do nothing but circle the wagons around their isms.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Here are just a few of the mind-boggling headlines in the Nov 12 Tennessean:

    "Obama rejects Afghan options" - this should inspire confidence in our troops being deployed to Afghanistan from Fort Hood

    "Obama bungled Gitmo closing" - yet we are to believe that Obama and Congress will not bungle health care, then on to cap& trade. Now we are preparing to try the 911 terrorists who declared war on the US in our civil courts as common criminals.

    "Spike in HIV saps Tenn. resources" - the state will seek more federal funding, but there are no guarantees it will get more

    "10 big states face budget catastrophes" - as state revenues plummet, our federal government just prints more dollars to cover its lack of revenue. Meanwhile, Nashville plans to move ahead with a new convention center, when the best facilities in Nashville at Opryland Hotel cannot get enough conventions.

    "U.S. risks following Japan's example" - heavy government stimulus spending and near-zero interest rates did little to end Japan's "lost decade" of stagnation and mushrooming debt, yet Washington thinks it will work here

    "Teens design artificial tree to absorb carbon" - the young scientists envision a day when carbon-converting artificial trees stand in backyards across the country. Did it ever occur to these teens to just plant more real carbon-absorbing trees, or are they on Gore's green payroll to become the next unprofitable industry Tennessee will buy into (remember TN's plan to make ethanol from grass and now corn cobs)?

    ReplyDelete
  16. A Tale of Four Ships

    Once upon a time there were four ships – (1) the USS Constitution, (2) the USS Titanic, (3) the USS California, and (4) the USS Carpathia.

    The USS Constitution represents the USA as God intended for her to be, “a shining city upon a hill whose beacon light guides freedom-loving people everywhere.”

    The USS Titanic represents the US Government/Economy with its increasing unsustainable debt.

    The USS California represents those who warned the USS Government/Economy that it was sailing into a sea of debt destruction, actually saw from about 10 miles away their distress flairs at midnight thinking they were celebration fireworks, then turned off their radios until after the USS Government/Economy sank into the debt of despair.

    The USS Carpathia represents those who heard the USS Government/Economy’s debt distress signals from 58 miles away, sped with great haste to rescue the USS Government/Economy debt survivors, preparing itself as it rushed to save as many debt survivors as possible when it arrived at the scene of the debt disaster.

    The real question is this: Which ship are you choosing to be on?

    There is great hope if we return to the USS Constitution, but I’m afraid no one is listening to the USS Titanic or the USS California, and we will become the USS Carpathia by default.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Letter to my Senator Lamar Alexander:

    So you are still not yet a skeptic that climategate is nothing but a massive scam created by global warmingites, including some scientists, to tie climate change to man-caused activities. How about a simple lesson in Climatology 101?

    (1) What was man doing or not doing during the 1950's thru the 1970's when scientists were actually worried that we were entering into a mini-iceage?

    (2) It was only when the mini-iceage of the 1970's ended that the global warmingites began to develop their beliefs that man had somehow caused the warming climate change of the 1980's thru the 1990's.

    (3) Since 1998 the global temps have actually decreased about 0.6C. When this data could not be fit into the fudged temp models that declared man's CO2 emissions were causing global temps to irreversibly increase, then a massive cover-up ensued to suppress this information.

    (4) Carbon dioxide is released to the atmosphere by a variety of natural sources, and over 95% of total CO2 emissions would occur even if humans were not present on Earth. For example, the natural decay of organic material in forests and grasslands, such as dead trees, results in the release of about 220 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide every year.

    (5) Therefore, climate change talks and agreements are about power, manipulation and control of the 5% of CO2 emissions that are caused by man, which includes breathing and burning fossil fuels!!! It's also about a massive wealth transfer from the "have nations" to the "have not" nations.

    (6) Pure and simple, climate change is about following the money of those who have irreversibly tied their welfare to climate change being man-caused!!! This includes scientists, politicians, and government workers, and global warmingites who will implement and profit from this massive scam.

    ReplyDelete
  18. This is what Copenhegen is all about !!!

    Thursday, December 17, 2009 at 10:34pm

    President Chavez brought the house down.

    When he said the process in Copenhagen was “not democratic, it is not inclusive, but isn’t that the reality of our world, the world is really and imperial dictatorship…down with imperial dictatorships” he got a rousing round of applause.

    When he said there was a “silent and terrible ghost in the room” and that ghost was called capitalism, the applause was deafening.

    But then he wound up to his grand conclusion – 20 minutes after his 5 minute speaking time was supposed to have ended and after quoting everyone from Karl Marx to Jesus Christ - “our revolution seeks to help all people…socialism, the other ghost that is probably wandering around this room, that’s the way to save the planet, capitalism is the road to hell.... let’s fight against capitalism and make it obey us.” He won a standing ovation.

    http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andre....of_chave z_fans
    .................................................

    The economic system will be the final system that manipulates/controls the world in the final days preceeding our Lord's return. Copenhagen is a clear sign of things to come.

    Our President has gone to Copenhagen to support Chavez and others who have no faith in our Lord God who want to destroy our economic system !!! It shows what Obama's true agenda is - from health care to cap & trade to the banks to the car companies to ......................... !!!

    I have no faith that Obama will change the direction that he is taking our country in. In 2010 Obama will throw massive earmarks/handouts/government jobs to save the Democrats from defeat. But in the process I believe Obama will destroy so much of our free economic systems that we will turn enough of his scoundrels out in 2010 re-gaining control of Congress, and then we can throw Obama out in 2012. If this happens and the Republicans don't reign in government spending and create an environment where business/capitalism can prosper, we are doomed as the leader of the free world, and the recession we're now in will seem mild when our economy really collapses !!!

    ReplyDelete
  19. 10 Men go out to Dinner... A helpful way to illustrate the tax burden

    Suppose that every day, ten men go out for dinner and the bill for all comes to $100.

    If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:

    The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing like they do now with the present income tax structure.

    The fifth would pay $1.

    The sixth would pay $3.

    The seventh would pay $7.

    The eighth would pay $12.

    The ninth would pay $18.

    The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59 of the bill.

    So that is what the ten men decide to do.

    The ten men ate dinner in the restaurant every day and seemed quite happy with the arrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. "Since you all are such good customers I am going to reduce the cost of your daily meal by $20". Dinner for the 10 men now costs just $80...

    The group still wanted to pay the bill the same way that they paid their taxes so the first four men were unaffected. They would still eat for free. But what about the other six men -- the Paying customers? How could they divide the $20 windfall so that everybody would get his "Fair Share"?

    They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But they subtracted that from everybody’s share, then the fifth and sixth man would each end up being paid to eat their meal…

    So, the restaurant owner suggested it would be fair to reduce each mans bill roughly the same amount; and proceeded to work out the amounts each man would pay.

    The fifth, like the first four now paid nothing (100% savings).

    The sixth man now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% savings)

    The seventh man now paid $5 instead of $7 (28% savings)

    The eight man now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings)

    The ninth man now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings)

    The tenth man now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings)

    Each of the six was better off then before. And the first four continued to eat for free. But once outside the restaurant, the men began to compare their savings…

    "I only got a dollar out of the $20," declared the sixth man. He pointed to the tenth man "but he got $10"…

    "Yeah, that’s right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too. Its unfair that he got ten times more than me!?"

    "That’s true", shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!"

    "Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn’t get anything at all. The system exploit’s the poor!"

    The nine men surrounded the tenth man and beat him up…

    The next night the Tenth man did not show up for dinner, so the Nine sat down and ate without him. But when it came time to pay the bill, they discovered something important. They didn’t have enough money between all of them for even half the bill!

    And that Boys & Girls, journalists and college professors, is how our tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the most benefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for being wealthy, and they just might not show up anymore. In fact, they might start eating overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier…

    Maybe the 10th man didn't show up for dinner because they killed him, and then redistributed his wealth among themselves, thinking they had all won the lottery.

    Has anyone looked at what happens to lottery winners who have not learned how to earn wealth, and then steward the blessings of wealth?
    The above story is not as improbable as some make it.

    Consider these facts:

    The top 1% earn 21% of all income, yet pay 39% of the income tax collected by the IRS.

    The top 5% earn 36% of all income, yet pay 60% of the income tax collected by the IRS.

    This leaves 95% who earn 64% of all income, yet pay only 40% of the income tax collected by the IRS.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Worse still is the 11th man at the table who is paying for what the 9 men can't afford with debt dollars!!!

    ReplyDelete
  21. One more comment about taxes. The bottom 50% of wage earners pay only 5% of all taxes, yet require and get the most government services. The Democrats must keep this 50% solidly in their support, and a some of the top 50% to stay in power. In 2008 Obama won by only 52.8% of the vote. When many of the top 50% of wage earners decide enough is enough and start bailing out of the economic system, do you think the bottom 50% of wage earners can pick up the stack?

    ReplyDelete
  22. Our associate pastor and his wife were recently called to plant a church in NC. So, our church went through the interviewing process and hired a new pastor. He and our old pastor have been working together, but last week was his first week on the job alone. On friday night he was arrested for DUI and thrown into jail. Because his wife had gone out of town for the weekend and he has no family down here to bond him out (and didn't know anyone else's phone numbers having just moved down here) he was kept there overnight and had to ride the public bus home the next day. He did the right thing and called one of the elders and told him what had happened. Our pastor was out of town, so the elders met (with the counsel of the pastor I'm sure) and decided to keep him on as associate pastor, with one stipulation... he had to get in front of the church and confess what he had done on Sunday morning. He was supposed to preach that Sunday, but he was not allowed to. Our old associate pastor preached (for the last time I guess). He told my husband last night that he was so afraid they were going to fire him. And they seriously could have, but they chose to lovingly discipline him. I don't know, though, if I was him that I would have had the courage to call and confess to the elders what he had done. He did the right thing, and I think that may have been one of the reasons they didn't fire him. Crazy though, he had only been on the job for 2-3 weeks and he was arrested for the first time ever!

    ReplyDelete
  23. This is not crazy at all! It's the way Christians are supposed to Scripturally act towards one another.

    James 5:16 says, "confess your sins to one another, and pray for one another, so that you may be healed."

    The problem comes when we don't follow the guideline love letter God has given us in His word. Be sure, if this pastor had not confessed his sin to this elder, his sin would have found him out, his new church would not have given him a second, and his marraige would probably have been in trouble.

    Openness and honesty are always the best route to take in God's kingdom.

    ReplyDelete